<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Abortion and Capital Punishment: No Contradiction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mandm.org.nz/2007/08/abortion-and-capital-punishment-no-contradiction.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mandm.org.nz/2007/08/abortion-and-capital-punishment-no-contradiction.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=abortion-and-capital-punishment-no-contradiction</link>
	<description>Philosophy of Religion, Ethics, Theology and Jurisprudence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:03:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Perfect Man</title>
		<link>http://www.mandm.org.nz/2007/08/abortion-and-capital-punishment-no-contradiction.html#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>The Perfect Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 03:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mandm.churchweb.co.nz/2007/08/abortion-and-capital-punishment-no-contradiction/#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Good work. At the end of all analysis Harrison and her ilk argue purely on emotional grounds. They want to be able to kill unborn babies because it suits the lifestyle they want to live.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I would bet the farm that you could not get her to sit through a logical presentation like this without her blood boiling over and her either walking out or verbally abusing you personally. If they can&#039;t beat your argument rationally then they always end up resorting to the emotional &quot;you are a man what did I expect but this&quot;. Or if their opponent is a female they will say &quot;you are obviously still suffering the effects of your own subjucation to a man (father, husband etc)&quot;. Of course they never accept an opposing woman&#039;s opinion because she is not one of the &#039;enlightened&#039; sisterhood.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Its always lose/lose with these types. They are only interested in outcomes that suit them, they are NOT interested in holding rational/logical debates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good work. At the end of all analysis Harrison and her ilk argue purely on emotional grounds. They want to be able to kill unborn babies because it suits the lifestyle they want to live.</p>
<p>I would bet the farm that you could not get her to sit through a logical presentation like this without her blood boiling over and her either walking out or verbally abusing you personally. If they can&#8217;t beat your argument rationally then they always end up resorting to the emotional &#8220;you are a man what did I expect but this&#8221;. Or if their opponent is a female they will say &#8220;you are obviously still suffering the effects of your own subjucation to a man (father, husband etc)&#8221;. Of course they never accept an opposing woman&#8217;s opinion because she is not one of the &#8216;enlightened&#8217; sisterhood.</p>
<p>Its always lose/lose with these types. They are only interested in outcomes that suit them, they are NOT interested in holding rational/logical debates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

