Comments on: Why Blaming the Ref is Not Welfarism http://www.mandm.org.nz/2007/10/why-blaming-the-ref-is-not-welfarism.html?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=why-blaming-the-ref-is-not-welfarism Philosophy of Religion, Ethics, Theology and Jurisprudence Thu, 09 Sep 2010 10:46:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Greg B http://www.mandm.org.nz/2007/10/why-blaming-the-ref-is-not-welfarism.html#comment-101 Greg B Fri, 12 Oct 2007 22:20:00 +0000 http://mandm.churchweb.co.nz/2007/10/why-blaming-the-ref-is-not-welfarism/#comment-101 Yes you're right but the ABs still had 70% possession and made 40 tackles to the French 170. <br/>Even with a poor ref those figures show that France hardly touched the ball. Even with a penalty bias awarding them the ball the French only had it 30% of the time. They should have been dead on their feet from tackling. What were we doing??<br/><br/>Oh well, France to win tonight and hopefully Argentina but I don't mind if SA win either. Yes you’re right but the ABs still had 70% possession and made 40 tackles to the French 170.
Even with a poor ref those figures show that France hardly touched the ball. Even with a penalty bias awarding them the ball the French only had it 30% of the time. They should have been dead on their feet from tackling. What were we doing??

Oh well, France to win tonight and hopefully Argentina but I don’t mind if SA win either.

]]>