<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Showing Christianity is True at Apologetics 315</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mandm.org.nz/2010/05/showing-christianity-is-true-at-apologetics-315.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mandm.org.nz/2010/05/showing-christianity-is-true-at-apologetics-315.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=showing-christianity-is-true-at-apologetics-315</link>
	<description>Philosophy of Religion, Ethics, Theology and Jurisprudence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:03:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pboyfloyd</title>
		<link>http://www.mandm.org.nz/2010/05/showing-christianity-is-true-at-apologetics-315.html#comment-125926</link>
		<dc:creator>pboyfloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 22:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mandm.org.nz/?p=3087#comment-125926</guid>
		<description>&quot;However, one is rational in accepting some beliefs independent of any argument showing the truth of those beliefs; philosophers term such beliefs ‘properly basic beliefs.’&quot;

Now why would the belief, independent of any argument showing the truth of said belief, that, &quot;There are no gods, not even one.&quot;,  be a &#039;caricature&#039; of the term &#039;properly basic belief&#039;??

Seems to me that you&#039;re just saying, &quot;Hey, this is our &#039;thing&#039;, not yours!!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;However, one is rational in accepting some beliefs independent of any argument showing the truth of those beliefs; philosophers term such beliefs ‘properly basic beliefs.’&#8221;</p>
<p>Now why would the belief, independent of any argument showing the truth of said belief, that, &#8220;There are no gods, not even one.&#8221;,  be a &#8216;caricature&#8217; of the term &#8216;properly basic belief&#8217;??</p>
<p>Seems to me that you&#8217;re just saying, &#8220;Hey, this is our &#8216;thing&#8217;, not yours!!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.mandm.org.nz/2010/05/showing-christianity-is-true-at-apologetics-315.html#comment-125916</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 21:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mandm.org.nz/?p=3087#comment-125916</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Have you covered the notion that atheists have the properly basic belief that there are no gods, not even one.?&lt;/i&gt;

 I have yet to met any atheist who maintains this, must claim to not beleive on the basis of an argument or epistemic criteria of some sort.  Moreover, its not clear to me that the arguments that belief in God is properly basic can be applied to atheism. 

Of course if you caricature peoples position as mere assertion you can make counter assertion, but then with caricatures you can esthablish any false claim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Have you covered the notion that atheists have the properly basic belief that there are no gods, not even one.?</i></p>
<p> I have yet to met any atheist who maintains this, must claim to not beleive on the basis of an argument or epistemic criteria of some sort.  Moreover, its not clear to me that the arguments that belief in God is properly basic can be applied to atheism. </p>
<p>Of course if you caricature peoples position as mere assertion you can make counter assertion, but then with caricatures you can esthablish any false claim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pboyfloyd</title>
		<link>http://www.mandm.org.nz/2010/05/showing-christianity-is-true-at-apologetics-315.html#comment-125722</link>
		<dc:creator>pboyfloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 11:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mandm.org.nz/?p=3087#comment-125722</guid>
		<description>Sorry, didn&#039;t read the comments. Just a quick question.

Have you covered the notion that atheists have the properly basic belief that there are no gods, not even one.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, didn&#8217;t read the comments. Just a quick question.</p>
<p>Have you covered the notion that atheists have the properly basic belief that there are no gods, not even one.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theology Geek NZ &#187; Free eBook “Is Christianity True?”</title>
		<link>http://www.mandm.org.nz/2010/05/showing-christianity-is-true-at-apologetics-315.html#comment-85197</link>
		<dc:creator>Theology Geek NZ &#187; Free eBook “Is Christianity True?”</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 01:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mandm.org.nz/?p=3087#comment-85197</guid>
		<description>[...] on the topic Is Christianity True? Twenty-three apologist bloggers contributed, Matt’s essay “Showing Christianity is True” was selected to be the concluding essay in the series, before Brian Auten&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the topic Is Christianity True? Twenty-three apologist bloggers contributed, Matt’s essay “Showing Christianity is True” was selected to be the concluding essay in the series, before Brian Auten&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thinking Matters &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Free Online Book: Is Christianity True?</title>
		<link>http://www.mandm.org.nz/2010/05/showing-christianity-is-true-at-apologetics-315.html#comment-84685</link>
		<dc:creator>Thinking Matters &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Free Online Book: Is Christianity True?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 08:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mandm.org.nz/?p=3087#comment-84685</guid>
		<description>[...] worldview against various intellectual challenges. With over twenty essays in the series (including one by Matt Flannagan), it is a compelling introduction and example of apologetics in action. Today, Brian has helpfully [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] worldview against various intellectual challenges. With over twenty essays in the series (including one by Matt Flannagan), it is a compelling introduction and example of apologetics in action. Today, Brian has helpfully [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thinking Matters &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Auckland Event: Is Belief in God Rational?</title>
		<link>http://www.mandm.org.nz/2010/05/showing-christianity-is-true-at-apologetics-315.html#comment-73239</link>
		<dc:creator>Thinking Matters &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Auckland Event: Is Belief in God Rational?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 07:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mandm.org.nz/?p=3087#comment-73239</guid>
		<description>[...] lunch, it will be a great opportunity to hear and interact with Matt (his talk will be based on his Showing Christianity is True essay, published as part of the Apologetics 315&#8242;s essay series). If you&#8217;re unable to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lunch, it will be a great opportunity to hear and interact with Matt (his talk will be based on his Showing Christianity is True essay, published as part of the Apologetics 315&#8242;s essay series). If you&#8217;re unable to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theology Geek NZ &#187; Is belief in God rational when you can’t prove God exists? @ Unitec</title>
		<link>http://www.mandm.org.nz/2010/05/showing-christianity-is-true-at-apologetics-315.html#comment-73195</link>
		<dc:creator>Theology Geek NZ &#187; Is belief in God rational when you can’t prove God exists? @ Unitec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 04:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mandm.org.nz/?p=3087#comment-73195</guid>
		<description>[...] Lecture Theatre on the Auckland Unitec campus on Carrington Rd. The talk will be based on the Showing Christianity is True essay Matt had published as part of Apologetics 315&#8242;s essay series, “Why is Christianity [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lecture Theatre on the Auckland Unitec campus on Carrington Rd. The talk will be based on the Showing Christianity is True essay Matt had published as part of Apologetics 315&#8242;s essay series, “Why is Christianity [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ropata</title>
		<link>http://www.mandm.org.nz/2010/05/showing-christianity-is-true-at-apologetics-315.html#comment-46038</link>
		<dc:creator>ropata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 01:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mandm.org.nz/?p=3087#comment-46038</guid>
		<description>I always find it hard to &quot;show Christianity is true&quot; by intellectual argument, but this is a fine attempt. Probably the best demonstration of the truth of Christianity is not via words but by actions. The evidence of God&#039;s love in transforming individuals and bringing about a better world...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always find it hard to &#8220;show Christianity is true&#8221; by intellectual argument, but this is a fine attempt. Probably the best demonstration of the truth of Christianity is not via words but by actions. The evidence of God&#8217;s love in transforming individuals and bringing about a better world&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

