Spotted this over at Hitting Metal with a Hammer in The real climate hockey stick revealed and had to have it:
It really raises questions of sustainability.
Tags: AGW · Climate Change · Climategate · Global Warming · Hockey Stick Graph19 Comments
December 16th, 2009 by
-
Matthew Flannagan on Amazon
Did God Really Command Genocide? Coming to Terms with the Justice of God Authors: Paul Copan, Matthew Flannagan
A common objection to belief in the God of the Bible is that a good, kind, and loving deity would never command the wholesale slaughter of nations. In the tradition of his popular Is God a Moral Monster?, Paul Copan teams up with Matthew Flannagan to tackle some of the most confusing and uncomfortable passages of Scripture. Together they help the Christian and nonbeliever alike understand the biblical, theological, philosophical, and ethical implications of Old Testament warfare passages.
Buy the paperback versionBuy the Kindle version
True Reason: Confronting the Irrationality of the New Atheism Eds: Tom Gilson, Carson Weitnauer
Today's New Atheists proclaim themselves our culture's party of reason. It is a claim they cannot sustain. Reason is the New Atheists' weakness, not their strength and in fact, the Christian faith is a far better place to look for True Reason. Making their case accessible to the first-time inquirer as well as the serious student, this top-flight team of writers presents a sound defense and a strong introduction to the true reason uniquely found in Christianity.
Feat. William Lane Craig, Sean McDowell, John DePoe, Chuck Edwards, Peter Grice, Matthew Flannagan, et al.Buy the paperback version
In Defense of the Bible: A Comprehensive Apologetic for the Authority of Scripture Eds: Steven B Cowan and Terry L Wilder
The book begins by examining foundational philosophical approaches to the Bible as well as the methodological challenges those philosophies create for interpreting the Bible. It then addresses textual and historical challenges and how to deal with them. Finally it looks at ethical, scientific, and theological challenges demonstrating the Bible's moral integrity in relationship to contemporary moral emphases.Feat. R Douglas Geivett, William A Dembski, Mary Jo Sharp, Darrell L Bock, Paul Copan, Matthew Flannagan, et al.Buy the paperback versionBuy the Kindle version
Virtues in Action: New Essays in Applied Virtue Ethics Ed: Michael W Austin
Many philosophers have considered the strengths and weaknesses of a virtue-centered approach to moral theory. Much less attention has been given to how such an approach bears on issues in applied ethics. The essays in this volume apply a virtue-centered perspective to a variety of contemporary moral issues.Feat. Michael W Austin, Robert K Garcia, Nathan L King, Gregory Bassham, Nancy E Snow, Matthew Flannagan, et al.Buy the hardcover version
Holy War in the Bible: Christian Morality and an Old Testament Problem Eds: Heath A Thomas, Jeremy Evans & Paul Copan
The challenge of a seemingly genocidal God who commands ruthless warfare has bewildered Bible readers for generations. A range of expert contributors engage in a multidisciplinary approach that considers this issue from a variety of perspectives: biblical, ethical, philosophical and theological.Feat. David Lamb, Paul Copan, Murray Rae, Heath Thomas, Stephen B Chapman, Douglas S Earl, Matthew Flannagan, et al.Buy the paperback version
Come Let Us Reason: New Essays in Christian Apologetics Eds: William Lane Craig & Paul Copan
The nineteen essays here raise classical philosophical questions in fresh ways, address contemporary challenges for the church, and will deepen the thinking of the next generation of apologists. Packed with dynamic topical discussions and informed by the latest scholarship.Feat. J P Moreland, William Lane Craig, Gary R Habermas, Craig Keener, Paul Copan, Matthew Flannagan, et al.Buy the paperback versionBuy the Kindle version
True Reason: Christian Responses to the Challenge of Atheism Eds: Tom Gilson, Carson Weitnauer
While New Atheists like Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, and others proclaim loudly their rationality, clear thinking, and incontrovertible scientific arguments, others are beginning to wonder how genuinely rational they are. Have they proved anything? Have they argued convincingly? Have they pinpointed any real challenges to the credibility of Christian faith?
Feat. William Lane Craig, Sean McDowell, John DePoe, Chuck Edwards, Peter Grice, Matthew Flannagan, et al.Buy the Kindle version
No, No, No,
I believe you are purposefully not taking into account the Medieval ‘Learning’ Period, where climate science flourished in Britain, and even in Greenland!
HERE IT IS! “A Renewed Call to Truth, Prudence, and Protection of the Poor” ~ An Evangelical Examination of the Theology, Science, and Economics of Global Warming!
Johnny, Don’t be such a pseudo scientist, you are clearly politically motivated in your comments and so because I have discerned political motives I can ignore your argument and dismiss your conclusions.
As every body knows, there was no “learning” in the middle ages, that was the dark ages where everyone believed the world was flat and science was suppressed by the Catholic Church while they, out of hatred towards women burnt 1000,000 women at the stake for witchcraft through the Inquisition, which banned all learning. I know this because I learn t it at high school, read it on Wikipedia and someone associated with Dawkins and Sagan said so and there was a book by Dan Brown documenting it. Get real
.-= My last blog-post ..Another Climate Change Science Hockey Stick Graph =-.
Hey… You-Hew Flanagan… fancy shortening your name to ‘Matt’!
Are you calling me a flat-learner?
You know, I don’t believe the ‘learning is settled,’ and I am prepared to follow the evidence where it leads me!
And No, I have not been payed off, or bought out by, ‘Big Uni’
My last blog-post .. An Evangelical Declaration on Global Warming ~ You Can Add Your Name!
I’m sorry Jonny but it was peer-reviewed by scientists, S.C.I.E.N.T.I.S.T.S. okay?
Anyone who thinks it is wrong is not a scientist.
.-= My last blog-post ..Three Questions for NIWA =-.
Well I think the graph is correct, and if you don’t then you must be anti science. By voicing any disagreement with this exquisite graph you are being both extreme and emotional, and you clearly need to get you anger issues under control.
PS, play the ball, not the man, you nutjob.
Well then, I must be, I can’t be… I HAVE TO BEEEEEEEEE… I can hardly bring myself to admit it, O No, what will they do with me… I am a skeptic, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
Hold on, wait a minute, isn’t that part of the method of science? Surely Not!
But, on the other hand, these are S.C.I.E.N.T.I.S.T.S., they can be trusted to be free from scandal… maybe I will ’email’ one of them!
My last blog-post .. What Does It Really Mean When a “Skeptical” Scientist Disputes The Global Warming Thesis?
You’re not a skeptic Jonny, you’re a DENIER!
This jelly-wrestling is not something I wish to be part of. What exactly is your point Jonny? You and your denier mates at Christian News who don’t like me very much and call me names need to stop contradicting yourselves and read some scientists.
You should especially note my blog post on this which for some reason keeps getting deleted.
If you are going to keep deleting my comments I’m going to go off to my own blog and talk about you there.
.-= My last blog-post ..View Episode 2 Pacific Viewpoint TV Panel on Abortion & Parental Consent Here (Feat. Madeleine) =-.
You guys do realise, don’t you, that ridicule is one of the most obvious forms of flattery? Often also a Freudian slip.
Anyway – it seems I have left an impression with you and my messages may have actually sunk home in some cases.
Have a happy summer solstice and I look forward to some educational discussion in the new year.
.-= My last blog-post ..Sack all those scientists? yeah, right! =-.
Glad to see you have a sense of humour Ken!
Merry Christmas to you 🙂
.-= My last blog-post ..View Episode 2 Pacific Viewpoint TV Panel on Abortion & Parental Consent Here (Feat. Madeleine) =-.
Summer Solstice? Who’s this girl? You been watching MTV again Ken?!
My last blog-post .. My Blog Fidelity is Being Called into Question!
Only 250,000? I would have thought there would have been far more once you throw in the 31,000 who signed the Oregon petition, the 400 (or was it 800) on Inhofe’s list, all the members of the heartland foundation, the NZCSC, Andrew Bolt, Ian Wishart etc. etc. the list of climate science experts is nearly endless.
With that many climate Scientists, I think I’ve found the source of all that hot air.
.-= My last blog-post ..A Christmas Wish =-.
Xmas Eve Ramble…
Here’s the REAL climate hockey stick! As Madeleine says, “It really raises questions of sustainability.”…
As the author of the graph I can assure all that the methodolgy was rigorous and pew revied by another employee whose job depended on giving the right answer. The so-called “Medieval Learning” was accounted for, however we were able to “adjust” for this by offsetting the aberate data because of the Medieval “bloody stupid’ period as exemplified by the excommunication of Galileo and the burning of housewifes for the excesive use of condiments on the pretext of witchcraft.
In this maner were able to hide the incline of total climateologist numbers.
The learning is settled and 99% of graph makers in the direct employ of the Society for Making Graphs That Show What We Want Them To are in agreement that this graph is accurate. The other 1% is on academic probation for independant thought and may need psyciatric evaluation.
.-= My last blog-post ..Leftist propaganda hacks in full swing over John Stewart interview =-.
[…] recall the groundbreaking announcement we made in our post Another Climate Change Science Hockey Stick Graph where we revealed the alarming hockey-stick shaped incline in the number of climate change […]
Oh, I’m so afraid of climate changes! It’s already hard to survive in city duaring hot summer. And in my childhood it was always cold and rainy!
Please, download mkv player.
You have got some really interesting materials on sustainability, I only wish the figures in the picture were seen more clearly – this chart is too complicated for me to figure out.
Personally I prefer this graph
http://religionpoisons.wordpress.com/2011/10/19/gods-supernatural-power-diagram/