It has been 2 years today since MandM was born and our first post, In Remembrance of the Religious Right, entered the blogosphere.
Apparently most blogs don’t make it to the 6 month mark so we are doing nicely.
Thanks everyone for your continued support.
Tags: Announcements3 Comments
A common objection to belief in the God of the Bible is that a good, kind, and loving deity would never command the wholesale slaughter of nations. In the tradition of his popular Is God a Moral Monster?, Paul Copan teams up with Matthew Flannagan to tackle some of the most confusing and uncomfortable passages of Scripture. Together they help the Christian and nonbeliever alike understand the biblical, theological, philosophical, and ethical implications of Old Testament warfare passages.
Today's New Atheists proclaim themselves our culture's party of reason. It is a claim they cannot sustain. Reason is the New Atheists' weakness, not their strength and in fact, the Christian faith is a far better place to look for True Reason. Making their case accessible to the first-time inquirer as well as the serious student, this top-flight team of writers presents a sound defense and a strong introduction to the true reason uniquely found in Christianity.
The book begins by examining foundational philosophical approaches to the Bible as well as the methodological challenges those philosophies create for interpreting the Bible. It then addresses textual and historical challenges and how to deal with them. Finally it looks at ethical, scientific, and theological challenges demonstrating the Bible's moral integrity in relationship to contemporary moral emphases.
Many philosophers have considered the strengths and weaknesses of a virtue-centered approach to moral theory. Much less attention has been given to how such an approach bears on issues in applied ethics. The essays in this volume apply a virtue-centered perspective to a variety of contemporary moral issues.
The challenge of a seemingly genocidal God who commands ruthless warfare has bewildered Bible readers for generations. A range of expert contributors engage in a multidisciplinary approach that considers this issue from a variety of perspectives: biblical, ethical, philosophical and theological.
The nineteen essays here raise classical philosophical questions in fresh ways, address contemporary challenges for the church, and will deepen the thinking of the next generation of apologists. Packed with dynamic topical discussions and informed by the latest scholarship.
While New Atheists like Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, and others proclaim loudly their rationality, clear thinking, and incontrovertible scientific arguments, others are beginning to wonder how genuinely rational they are. Have they proved anything? Have they argued convincingly? Have they pinpointed any real challenges to the credibility of Christian faith?
Happy Birthday MandM and thankyou for all you offer to the blogosphere.
Apparently most blogs don’t make it to the 6 month mark so we are doing nicely.
That is interesting, though not surprising. I would be interested in seeing the cumulative stats on blogs, the speed at which they drop off and the time at which the slope becomes asymptotic, i.e. how long does a blog need to last before it is likely to continue indefinitely.
I thought it a possibility that I would not be able to maintain a blog so I set myself a target of at least 1 post a week, i.e. not too heavy a burden.
I am sure David Farrar knows the answer to that – it would be interesting to know though I agree.
Our goal is 1 heavy philosopical post, each, per week and every 2 days something quick whether its a different take on something everyone is talking about or something light. This makes it quite demanding but we decided some months back to try to make our blog our ‘brand’ given Matt is employment hunting and we do pick up the odd speaking engagement which usually pays something off it too.