MandM header image 5

Entries from February 28th, 2011

Contra Mundum: “Till Death do us Part” Christ’s Teachings on Abuse, Divorce and Remarriage

February 28th, 2011 40 Comments

Anne was clearly angry. She relayed how her former husband had been abusive, had beaten her and sexually violated her. Despite this, however, he had never – as far as she knew – had an affair. Did this mean she had sinned before God for leaving her marriage? Was she now required to remain celibate [...]

Tags:   · · · · · ·

Hearing the Voice of God: Tragedy and its Aftershocks

February 28th, 2011 25 Comments

The “big one” has hit Christchurch. Few in the entire country will be untouched or unaffected, since we in New Zealand are a little village. To a man each will have relatives, friends, colleagues and mates in Christchurch. In that sense it is a national disaster. The meaning and significance of such disasters are always [...]

Tags:  

Fallacy Friday Podcast on Apologetics 315: Introduction & What is an Argument?

February 27th, 2011 No Comments

Apologetics 315 are producing an audio version of Matt’s Fallacy Friday series. The Fallacy Friday Podcasts will be released every Friday on Apologetics 315. You can subscribe using: • RSS Feed • Via iTunes • one-click to your feed-reader The Mp3 of the introduction to the series is here; the first episode: What is an Argument? is here. [...]

Tags:   ·

Fallacy Friday: Tu Quoque (But you did it too!)

February 25th, 2011 25 Comments

Last week I looked at the Straw Man Fallacy, today I want to explore the tu quoque fallacy. In latin tu quoque (too kwo-kwee) means “you too”;  in fact, the phrase “you did it too” is a good, succinct account of this fallacy. A tu quoque occurs when one rebuts a particular criticism of one’s own position by [...]

Tags:   · ·

Hoist with one’s own petard

February 24th, 2011 28 Comments

When a Christian says that all other religions are false, he is deemed narrow minded. When an atheist says that all religions are false, she is deemed open minded.      

Tags:   ·

The Presumption of Theism

February 23rd, 2011 87 Comments

Modern analytic philosophy of religion, so it seems, is largely dominated by purely theoretical and evidential considerations. That is, the question of whether or not theistic belief is rational is decided purely on the balance of total available public evidence as opposed to existential and pragmatic considerations. The addition of the term “public” to the [...]

Tags:   · · · ·

Prayers for the victims of the Christchurch Earthquake

February 22nd, 2011 9 Comments

We are devastated for our countrymen who were struck by a very shallow, yet very destructive, 6.3 magnitude earthquake in Christchurch, New Zealand this afternoon. While it may have been smaller than September’s 7.1 magnitude earthquake, all reports show that this one was far worse in terms of its violence and impact. Today many people have [...]

Tags:  

The Sceptic and the Scientist: Ed Feser on Richard Dawkins and PZ Myers

February 20th, 2011 39 Comments

He is not one to pull punches and true to form, in To a Louse, Ed Feser holds a mirror up to the kind of reasoning that is all too common amongst Dawkins and Myers fans with this fictional dialogue between a scientist and a science sceptic; Skeptic: Science is BS. Physicists believe in these things [...]

Tags:   · · · ·

Fallacy Friday: The Straw Man

February 19th, 2011 15 Comments

In my last Fallacy Friday I covered the The Genetic Fallacy, the error of arguing that an idea is false on the basis of where it originated from. Today I want to look at what’s known as the “straw man” fallacy. Origins of the Name This fallacy takes its name from a practice common in the [...]

Tags:   ·

Abortion and the Morality of Feticide: Part II

February 16th, 2011 154 Comments

In my last post, Abortion and the Morality of Feticide: Part I, I briefly sketched an argument against feticide, [1] It is wrong to kill a human being without justification; [2] A fetus is a human being; [3] In the case of feticide (at least in the majority of cases) insufficient or no justification is forthcoming. [...]

Tags:   · · · · · · · · ·