MandM header image 5

Entries Tagged as 'Atheism'

Weight Watchers and the Historical Atrocities Argument

July 8th, 2009 6 Comments

We’ve all heard the slogan that atheism is superior to theism because of all the atrocities committed in the name of religion. If you flick through the pages of the new-atheist publications by the likes of Dawkins, Hitchens, Loftus, Harris, et al you’ll probably find some version of this assertion in each.
Setting aside the dubious [...]

Tags:   · · ·

John Loftus on Madeleine Flannagan and Women and Other Red Herrings

July 1st, 2009 7 Comments

A few days ago I posted, Sunday Study: Slavery, John Locke and the Bible; in this post I defended an argument proposed by John Locke that the Bible does not support slavery. In that article I quoted from John Loftus’ book “Why I Became an Atheist” as an example of what is typically meant by [...]

Tags:   · · · · ·

Tooley, Plantinga and the Deontological Argument from Evil Part II

May 27th, 2009 1 Comment

In my last post, Tooley, Plantinga and the Deontological Argument from Evil Part I, I sketched Tooley’s distinction between a deontological and an axiological argument from evil and argued that Tooley rejects the axiological version because it rests on controversial ethical claims that are likely to be rejected by many theists. I outlined Tooley’s deontological [...]

Tags:   · · · · · ·

Tooley, Plantinga and the Deontological Argument from Evil Part I

May 13th, 2009 1 Comment

This two-part series criticises the deontological argument from evil proposed by Micheal Tooley in The Knowledge of God, the print debate between him and Alvin Plantinga.1 My critique proceeds in four parts. Initially I will sketch Tooley’s distinction between a deontological and an axiological argument from evil and will argue that Tooley rejects the axiological [...]

Tags:   · · · · · ·

John W. Loftus on The Christian Illusion of Moral Superiority Part II

May 8th, 2009 2 Comments

In my previous post, John W. Loftus on The Christian Illusion of Moral Superiority Part I, I argued that Loftus’ position was based on a confusion between ontological and epistemological foundations. I will now address his arguments against divine command theory.
Loftus’ Arguments Against a Divine Command Theory
After misconstruing the divine command theory as an [...]

Tags:   · · · · · ·

John W. Loftus on The Christian Illusion of Moral Superiority Part I

May 7th, 2009 12 Comments

Several Christian thinkers, most notably, C S Lewis, John Hare, Robert Adams and William Lane Craig have argued that Theism provides a superior foundation for moral obligation than Naturalism does. Most of these thinkers defend this notion by developing and defending a divine command theory.[1] John W Loftus is aware of this and in The [...]

Tags:   · · · · · · ·

Divine Commands and Intuitions: A Response to Ken Perrott

May 5th, 2009 34 Comments

Ken Perrott from Open Parachute has asked me some questions about my views on morality and divine commands. Views I have repeatedly expressed on this blog. Given that others have from time to time asked me similar questions, and given the length of my response, I have decided to turn my answers into a post. [...]

Tags:   · · · ·

With God Anything can be Permitted: Another Bad Argument against Theistic Morality

April 28th, 2009 30 Comments

Dostoevsky’s Ivan Karamazov’s famously contended that if God does not exist then anything is permissible. Ken over at Open Parachute disagrees and goes one step further and argues that the shoe is on the other foot. Ken maintains that theistic accounts of obligation lead to an “extreme form of moral relativism” and in fact, Dostoevsky’s [...]

Tags:   · · · ·

Guest Post: The Virtue of Christian Dogma

April 17th, 2009 24 Comments

The following is authored by Dominic Bnonn Tennant, of the blog Dominic Bnonn Tennant – Developing the Mind of Christ. Please support Bnonn by clicking through to his site. Bnonn writes:
Damian over at ‘And Slaters Go Plop’ has recently written on Dogma, arguing against its intellectual legitimacy, and asking how we can avoid it. He [...]

Tags:   · ·

Maverick Philosopher on the Historical Atrocities Argument

April 11th, 2009 7 Comments

In making their case against theism many of the “new atheists” (indeed many of the old) commonly appeal to historical atrocities allegedly committed by believers in God. I was discussing this phenomena recently with Doug Geivett in the aftermath of the Craig v Hitchens debate. I cited the need for Christian apologists to rebut not [...]

Tags:   · · · · · · ·