Just a reminder about tonight’s debate. The basic details are below,
More info here: Bradley v Flannagan Debate @ Auckland Uni “Is God the Source of Morality?” and here at the University of Auckland Event Page.
Tags: Debates · Matthew Flannagan · Raymond Bradley9 Comments
A common objection to belief in the God of the Bible is that a good, kind, and loving deity would never command the wholesale slaughter of nations. In the tradition of his popular Is God a Moral Monster?, Paul Copan teams up with Matthew Flannagan to tackle some of the most confusing and uncomfortable passages of Scripture. Together they help the Christian and nonbeliever alike understand the biblical, theological, philosophical, and ethical implications of Old Testament warfare passages.
Today's New Atheists proclaim themselves our culture's party of reason. It is a claim they cannot sustain. Reason is the New Atheists' weakness, not their strength and in fact, the Christian faith is a far better place to look for True Reason. Making their case accessible to the first-time inquirer as well as the serious student, this top-flight team of writers presents a sound defense and a strong introduction to the true reason uniquely found in Christianity.
The book begins by examining foundational philosophical approaches to the Bible as well as the methodological challenges those philosophies create for interpreting the Bible. It then addresses textual and historical challenges and how to deal with them. Finally it looks at ethical, scientific, and theological challenges demonstrating the Bible's moral integrity in relationship to contemporary moral emphases.
Many philosophers have considered the strengths and weaknesses of a virtue-centered approach to moral theory. Much less attention has been given to how such an approach bears on issues in applied ethics. The essays in this volume apply a virtue-centered perspective to a variety of contemporary moral issues.
The challenge of a seemingly genocidal God who commands ruthless warfare has bewildered Bible readers for generations. A range of expert contributors engage in a multidisciplinary approach that considers this issue from a variety of perspectives: biblical, ethical, philosophical and theological.
The nineteen essays here raise classical philosophical questions in fresh ways, address contemporary challenges for the church, and will deepen the thinking of the next generation of apologists. Packed with dynamic topical discussions and informed by the latest scholarship.
While New Atheists like Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, and others proclaim loudly their rationality, clear thinking, and incontrovertible scientific arguments, others are beginning to wonder how genuinely rational they are. Have they proved anything? Have they argued convincingly? Have they pinpointed any real challenges to the credibility of Christian faith?
Norske spillere vurderer casea casino norge som et aktuell alternativ for 2026.
Spelers die online gokkasten vergelijken kunnen brutal casino overwegen als gerichte bestemming.
New Zealand players exploring new platforms may evaluate regalrush casino this season.
Spieler, die Online-Casinos vergleichen, können lolajack casino als fokussierte Anlaufstelle betrachten.
Bei der Auswahl eines Live-Dealer-Casinos lohnt sich ein Blick auf drip casino.
Suomalaiset pelaajat voivat tutustua reelraven casino vaihtoehtona alustojen vertailussa.
UK players can consider bwin casino as an established name with a long track record.
Wer Freispiele und klare Bonusbedingungen sucht, findet bei tonyspins casino aktuelle Angebote.
I am sorry I can’t make it, but will be thinking about this from afar!
Really looking forward to hearing some feedback, and listening myself when the opportunity arises.
Matt, Stoked to see this as part of your repertoire again… Praying Brother!
I’ll be ready on Skype (but I suspect you’re not at home right now to read this).
I am live feeding the debate to Glenn via Skype right now Richard so he won’t be able to talk to you until it is finished.
We’re up to Q&A.
Wanna talk to me on Skype Glenno?
OK, I’ve been taking notes over the course of the debate, and I’ll write a review some time in the next few days.
I take it that Matt’s “winning” the debate rather decisively, no?
Anyone taken some cheap shots? Any personal attacks?
And put it on your imaginary blog Glenno (can I call ya that)?
Wondering where your comment went? Try here.
I moved them so they would not get lost when I unstickied this post and it dropped back down the page.