MandM header image 5

Entries Tagged as 'Philosophers'

On Believing Without Proof: Some reflections on Faith and Reason

September 24th, 2007 2 Comments

Recently in correspondence with non believer I have repeatedly meet with the following argument. This is usually touted as a kind of self evident mantra. [1] There is no proof that God exists [2] Its irrational to believe something unless you have proof . Therefore: [3] belief in the existence of God is irrational. Now […]

Tags:   · ·

Against Liberal Morality

August 10th, 2007 Comments Off on Against Liberal Morality

In debates over abortion, homosexual conduct, euthanasia, prostitution, drugs. Those who call themselves liberals often mount the same basic argument. A socially or morally permissive stance is necessitated towards such practices because people have a right to choose do what ever they like with their bodies. As Mill put it, The only part of the […]

Tags:   · · · · ·

Abortion and Capital Punishment: No Contradiction

August 2nd, 2007 1 Comment

This blog post has been published in Think: A Journal of the Royal Institute for Philosophy 6 (2008) 87-92, which is a journal of Cambridge University. One argument I frequently hear is that opposition to feticide, the killing of a human fetus, is inconsistent with support for capital punishment. Some times this argument is pushed even further. […]

Tags:   · · · · ·

Caricature at no god zone

August 1st, 2007 Comments Off on Caricature at no god zone

As a person who studies theology and philosophy I have, over the years, read some brilliant skeptics; John Mackie and Paul Draper come to mind. I also have become reasonably informed about the debate over theism in the literature. Consquently, I have a good idea when the issues are being caricatured. Unfortunately rebuttal of a […]

Tags:   · · ·

The Dawkins Delusion

July 31st, 2007 35 Comments

A friend sent me this this morning: This is great, witty satire. I particularly like the parody of Dawkins’ “Who made God” argument. Dr Terry Tommyrot addresses the question of whether science can explain the existence of Dawkins’ books without postulating the existence of an intelligent author, Richard Dawkins. Tommyrot asks, “If Dawkins designed this […]

Tags:   · · · · ·

The Meta-Ethical Argument for Christian Theism: A Response to Richard Chappell

July 3rd, 2007 15 Comments

if we ask what God would have commanded in counterfactual situations we will get contradictory answers.

Tags:   · · · ·

What’s Wrong with Whaling?

February 17th, 2007 3 Comments

With governments refusing to help ships that engage in it and ‘peace’ activists apparently willing to ram ships to prevent it, one assumes that whaling is a grave moral evil. It is, apparently, obviously so. Unfortunately, I fail to see why. How is killing a whale any different from fishing for marlin or shark or […]

Tags:   · ·