MandM header image 5

Entries Tagged as 'Divine Command Theory'

Van Inwagen, Divine Duties and the Deontological Argument from Evil

January 9th, 2010 1 Comment

In Tooley, Plantinga and the Deontological Argument from Evil Part I and Part II, I discussed Michael Tooley’s deontological argument from evil. In The Problem of Evil Peter Van Inwagen makes a reference to the type of argument I proposed. In this post I intend to make some critical commentary on Van Inwagen’s comments.
Tooley states, [...]

Tags:   · · ·

Walter Sinnott-Armstrong and Infantile Religious Morality

September 24th, 2009 71 Comments

In “Why Traditional Theism Cannot Provide an Adequate Foundation for Morality” Walter Sinnott Armstrong criticises William Lane Craig’s contention that theism, if true, provides an adequate foundation for morality. Armstrong contends that Craig’s position is “incredible”[1] and subject to a “cavalcade of devastating objections.”[2] He goes on to conclude that his criticisms do not just [...]

Tags:   · · · · · ·

Tekton E-Book: John Loftus’ Why I Became an Atheist Refuted Feat. MandM

September 17th, 2009 5 Comments

Tekton Education and Apologetics ministries have released an online book, John Loftus’ Why I Became an Atheist Refuted, as a special edition for their E-Block Online Journal. While most of the book is authored by J. P. Holding, Chapter 2 is not completely,
Chapter 2: “The Christian Illusion of Rational and Moral Superiority” — Two part [...]

Tags:   · · · · ·

The Theology of the Declaration of Independence

July 4th, 2009 2 Comments

As I write this it is probably just beginning to be the 4th of July in the United States now, though its been 4th July for some time here in New Zealand.
The 4th of July is, of course, Independence Day. Typically in New Zealand, those members of the secular blogosphere, who consider themselves to be [...]

Tags:   · · · · · ·

Tooley, Plantinga and the Deontological Argument from Evil Part II

May 27th, 2009 1 Comment

In my last post, Tooley, Plantinga and the Deontological Argument from Evil Part I, I sketched Tooley’s distinction between a deontological and an axiological argument from evil and argued that Tooley rejects the axiological version because it rests on controversial ethical claims that are likely to be rejected by many theists. I outlined Tooley’s deontological [...]

Tags:   · · · · · ·

Tooley, Plantinga and the Deontological Argument from Evil Part I

May 13th, 2009 1 Comment

This two-part series criticises the deontological argument from evil proposed by Micheal Tooley in The Knowledge of God, the print debate between him and Alvin Plantinga.1 My critique proceeds in four parts. Initially I will sketch Tooley’s distinction between a deontological and an axiological argument from evil and will argue that Tooley rejects the axiological [...]

Tags:   · · · · · ·

John W. Loftus on The Christian Illusion of Moral Superiority Part II

May 8th, 2009 2 Comments

In my previous post, John W. Loftus on The Christian Illusion of Moral Superiority Part I, I argued that Loftus’ position was based on a confusion between ontological and epistemological foundations. I will now address his arguments against divine command theory.
Loftus’ Arguments Against a Divine Command Theory
After misconstruing the divine command theory as an [...]

Tags:   · · · · · ·

John W. Loftus on The Christian Illusion of Moral Superiority Part I

May 7th, 2009 12 Comments

Several Christian thinkers, most notably, C S Lewis, John Hare, Robert Adams and William Lane Craig have argued that Theism provides a superior foundation for moral obligation than Naturalism does. Most of these thinkers defend this notion by developing and defending a divine command theory.[1] John W Loftus is aware of this and in The [...]

Tags:   · · · · · · ·

Divine Commands and Intuitions: A Response to Ken Perrott

May 5th, 2009 34 Comments

Ken Perrott from Open Parachute has asked me some questions about my views on morality and divine commands. Views I have repeatedly expressed on this blog. Given that others have from time to time asked me similar questions, and given the length of my response, I have decided to turn my answers into a post. [...]

Tags:   · · · ·

With God Anything can be Permitted: Another Bad Argument against Theistic Morality

April 28th, 2009 30 Comments

Dostoevsky’s Ivan Karamazov’s famously contended that if God does not exist then anything is permissible. Ken over at Open Parachute disagrees and goes one step further and argues that the shoe is on the other foot. Ken maintains that theistic accounts of obligation lead to an “extreme form of moral relativism” and in fact, Dostoevsky’s [...]

Tags:   · · · ·