MandM header image 5

Entries Tagged as 'Philosophy of Religion'

The Euthyphro Objection Part III: The Redundancy of God is Good

November 1st, 2007 8 Comments

My first post in this series, The Euthyphro Objection Part I: Against Divine Commands & Avoiding Strawmen, I examined Peter Singer’s version of the Euthyphro argument and demonstrated that it relies upon a strawman. In my Part II I criticised Singer’s utilisation of the arbitrariness objection against divine command theory. Singer’s last objection comes as a rejoinder […]

Tags:   · · · · · · ·

The Euthyphro Objection Part II: Arbitrariness

October 31st, 2007 4 Comments

In his work Practical Ethics Singer proposes a version of the Euthyphro dilemma to criticise a divine command theory of ethics, Some theists say that ethics cannot do without religion because the very meaning of “good” is nothing other than “what God approves”. Plato refuted a similar view more than two thousand years ago by […]

Tags:   · · · · · · · ·

The Euthyphro Objection Part I: Against Divine Commands & Avoiding Strawmen

October 28th, 2007 2 Comments

Perhaps the most common argument against an appeal to divine commands in ethical reasoning is the Euthyphro dilemma, first articulated by Plato and utilised by numerous critics of divine commands ever since. A representative example of this line of argument occurs in Peter Singer’s widely-acclaimed monograph Practical Ethics. In the first chapter of Practical Ethics, […]

Tags:   · · · · · · · · · ·

Contra PC

September 26th, 2007 2 Comments

Not PC has taken exception to my recent criticism of his blog. He also takes issue with my comments on faith and reason. His responses I think are illustrative of the popular secular mindset so it’s worth responding here. PC expounds a great deal of rhetorical energy describing my work in pejorative terms. I committed […]

Tags:   · · · ·

More Facile Anti-Theism

September 24th, 2007 Comments Off on More Facile Anti-Theism

Not PC has a blog on “How Faith destroys Knowledge”. The basic line of argument appears to be as follows: three famous thinkers appear to hold that faith and reason are at odds and that faith is the preferable stance. I am tempted to say so what? Does the fact that three people appear to […]

Tags:   · · ·