MandM header image 5

Entries Tagged as 'Ethics'

The State is Not Above the Law: Bennett and the Beneficiaries

July 31st, 2009 14 Comments

In their haste to jump to the aspect of the Paula Bennett and the beneficiaries story that best supports their political view, most commentators seem to be missing the fact that Paula Bennett, government Minister, arguably broke the law when she reached into her department’s records and made public the precise amounts of welfare each […]

Tags:

Dr Glenn Peoples on Abortion, Morality and Law

July 27th, 2009 2 Comments

Canterbury student group Prolife UC have organised for Dr Glenn Peoples to deliver some free public lectures at the University of Canterbury in Christchurch on Abortion, Morality and Law. Thursday 30th July 7.30 pm“Chasing the Justificatory Goalpost: Public Justification and Religious Beliefs” There is a broad political tradition that we are a part of that […]

Tags:

Sunday Study: Abraham and Isaac – Did God Command the Killing of an Innocent?

July 26th, 2009 17 Comments

Perhaps the most infamous passage in the Hebrew scriptures occurs in Genesis 22:2, Then God said, “Take your son, your only son, Isaac, whom you love, and go to the region of Moriah. Sacrifice him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains I will tell you about.” Of course, as anyone who […]

Tags:   · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·

Sunday Study: Christ on The Prohibition on Homicide Part II

July 19th, 2009 10 Comments

This post is the second in my series on Christ’s exposition of the 6th Commandment, the prohibition on homicide, contained in the Sermon on the Mount in Matthew 5: 21-26. In Sunday Study: Christ on The Prohibition on Homicide Part I, I looked at what The Torah taught about homicide, in this post I will […]

Tags:   · ·

Walter Sinnott-Armstrong on God, Morality and Arbitrariness

July 17th, 2009 21 Comments

Is morality independent of religion? One common argument for this position is that denying it makes God’s commands arbitrary. Walter Sinnott-Armstrong argues, Let’s assume that God commanded us not to rape. Did God have any reason to command this? If not, his command was arbitrary, and then it can’t make anything morally wrong. On the […]

Tags:   · · · · ·

Boonin’s Defense of the Sentience Criterion: A Critique Part II

July 16th, 2009 Comments Off on Boonin’s Defense of the Sentience Criterion: A Critique Part II

In Boonin’s Defense of the Sentience Criterion: A Critique Part I, I noted that a defender of the permissibility of feticide, who does not also want to endorse infanticide and who defends the sentience criterion, must “identify a reason for holding that the potential of a human brain is morally relevant after” the fetus acquires […]

Tags:   · · · · ·

Boonin’s Defense of the Sentience Criterion: A Critique Part I

July 15th, 2009 3 Comments

This two-part series was originally published as: Matthew Flannagan “Boonin’s Defense of the Sentience Criterion: A Critique” Ethics and Medicine – An International Journal of Bioethics Vol 25:2 (Summer 2009) 95-106. It is reproduced on this blog with permission. Abstract Defenders of the permissibility of feticide commonly argue that killing an organism is not homicide […]

Tags:   · · · · ·