MandM header image 5

Entries Tagged as 'Divine Command Theory'

Wolterstorff, the Canaanites and Hyperbole: A Response to Ken Pulliam

June 29th, 2010 47 Comments

Critics of Christianity often ask how can a good and loving God command the extermination of the Canaanites as is taught the Old Testament? A clear assumption behind this question is that the Old Testament teaches that God did in fact command the extermination of the Canaanites, an assumption which is based on a straight-forward [...]

Tags:   · · · · ·

Van Inwagen, Divine Duties and the Deontological Argument from Evil

January 9th, 2010 1 Comment

In Tooley, Plantinga and the Deontological Argument from Evil Part I and Part II, I discussed Michael Tooley’s deontological argument from evil. In The Problem of Evil Peter Van Inwagen makes a reference to the type of argument I proposed. In this post I intend to make some critical commentary on Van Inwagen’s comments. Tooley [...]

Tags:   · · ·

Walter Sinnott-Armstrong and Infantile Religious Morality

September 24th, 2009 71 Comments

In “Why Traditional Theism Cannot Provide an Adequate Foundation for Morality” Walter Sinnott Armstrong criticises William Lane Craig’s contention that theism, if true, provides an adequate foundation for morality. Armstrong contends that Craig’s position is “incredible”[1] and subject to a “cavalcade of devastating objections.”[2] He goes on to conclude that his criticisms do not just [...]

Tags:   · · · · · ·

Tekton E-Book: John Loftus’ Why I Became an Atheist Refuted Feat. MandM

September 17th, 2009 5 Comments

Tekton Education and Apologetics ministries have released an online book, John Loftus’ Why I Became an Atheist Refuted, as a special edition for their E-Block Online Journal. While most of the book is authored by JP Holding, Chapter 2 is not completely, Chapter 2: “The Christian Illusion of Rational and Moral Superiority” — Two part [...]

Tags:   · · · · ·

Walter Sinnott-Armstrong on God, Morality and Arbitrariness

July 17th, 2009 21 Comments

Is morality independent of religion? One common argument for this position is that denying it makes God’s commands arbitrary. Walter Sinnott-Armstrong argues, Let’s assume that God commanded us not to rape. Did God have any reason to command this? If not, his command was arbitrary, and then it can’t make anything morally wrong. On the [...]

Tags:   · · · · ·

Tooley, Plantinga and the Deontological Argument from Evil Part II

May 27th, 2009 3 Comments

In my last post, Tooley, Plantinga and the Deontological Argument from Evil Part I, I sketched Tooley’s distinction between a deontological and an axiological argument from evil and argued that Tooley rejects the axiological version because it rests on controversial ethical claims that are likely to be rejected by many theists. I outlined Tooley’s deontological [...]

Tags:   · · · · · ·

Tooley, Plantinga and the Deontological Argument from Evil Part I

May 13th, 2009 2 Comments

This two-part series criticises the deontological argument from evil proposed by Micheal Tooley in The Knowledge of God, the print debate between him and Alvin Plantinga.1 My critique proceeds in four parts. Initially I will sketch Tooley’s distinction between a deontological and an axiological argument from evil and will argue that Tooley rejects the axiological [...]

Tags:   · · · · · · ·

John W. Loftus on The Christian Illusion of Moral Superiority Part II

May 8th, 2009 5 Comments

In my previous post, John W. Loftus on The Christian Illusion of Moral Superiority Part I, I argued that Loftus’ position was based on a confusion between ontological and epistemological foundations. I will now address his arguments against divine command theory. Loftus’ Arguments Against a Divine Command Theory After misconstruing the divine command theory as [...]

Tags:   · · · · · ·

John W. Loftus on The Christian Illusion of Moral Superiority Part I

May 7th, 2009 14 Comments

Several Christian thinkers, most notably, C S Lewis, John Hare, Robert Adams and William Lane Craig have argued that Theism provides a superior foundation for moral obligation than Naturalism does. Most of these thinkers defend this notion by developing and defending a divine command theory.[1] John W Loftus is aware of this and in The [...]

Tags:   · · · · · · ·

Divine Commands and Intuitions: A Response to Ken Perrott

May 5th, 2009 34 Comments

Ken Perrott from Open Parachute has asked me some questions about my views on morality and divine commands. Views I have repeatedly expressed on this blog. Given that others have from time to time asked me similar questions, and given the length of my response, I have decided to turn my answers into a post. [...]

Tags:   · · · ·