MandM header image 5

Entries Tagged as 'Divine Command Theory'

What is the Question?: John Gay’s “Dissertation Concerning the Fundamental Principle of Virtue or Morality”

April 3rd, 2021 Comments Off on What is the Question?: John Gay’s “Dissertation Concerning the Fundamental Principle of Virtue or Morality”

In recent posts I have been looking at the rhetorical question: “if there is no God, why be good?” In my last post, I suggested one way to understand this question was in terms of Henry Sidgwick’s famous argument regarding the “dualism of practical reason. As I interpreted Sidgwick, his argument had three steps. First, […]

Tags:   · · · · ·

What is the Question?: Henry Sidgwick’s Dualism of Practical Reason

March 26th, 2021 Comments Off on What is the Question?: Henry Sidgwick’s Dualism of Practical Reason

In a previous post, I criticised Richard Dawkins’s discussion of the question: if there is no God, why be good? One criticism I raised was that Dawkins seemed to misunderstand the challenge this rhetorical question presents.  This raises the question as to how we should understand this rhetorical question. What exactly is the problem being […]

Tags:   · · · · ·

Published in Sophia “Why the Horrendous deeds objection is still a bad argument”

February 12th, 2021 3 Comments

My paper, “Why the Horrendous deeds objection is still a bad argument” has now been published by Sophia here.  The abstract is as follows: A common objection to divine command meta-ethics (‘DCM’) is the horrendous deeds objection. Critics object that if DCM is true, anything at all could be right, no matter how abhorrent or […]

Tags:   · · · · · · · ·

The Psychopath Objection to Divine Command Theory: Presentation

December 15th, 2020 Comments Off on The Psychopath Objection to Divine Command Theory: Presentation

www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHhmuqBW6Dw”>dialogue

Last year, I presented a talk entitled “The Psychopath Objection to Divine Command Theory: Another Reply to Erik Wielenberg” to the New Zealand Association of Philosophers conference in Auckland. This was a follow up to interaction I have had with the work of Erik Wielenberg. In 2017 I wrote a critical response to Wielenberg’s book Robust […]

Tags:   · · · ·

Problems in Value Theory An Introduction to Contemporary Debates: My Chapter with Graham Oppy is finally published

February 10th, 2020 Comments Off on Problems in Value Theory An Introduction to Contemporary Debates: My Chapter with Graham Oppy is finally published

Yesterday, I was informed that the book Problems in Value Theory An Introduction to Contemporary Debates has finally been published. The book is now available both on amazon on Bloomsbury’s website. Chapter 3 of this book “Does Morality Depend on God?” is co-authored by myself and Graham Oppy (Monash University). Both Graham and I each wrote […]

Tags:   · ·

Divine Command Theory: answering classic and contemporary objections

February 3rd, 2020 Comments Off on Divine Command Theory: answering classic and contemporary objections

Last week Jordan Hampton from Crash Course Apologetics interviewed me about chapters 12-13 of my book Did God Really Command Genocide. In this is the section of the book, I discuss divine command metaethics and critique some of the most important objections raised against divine command theories. The interview is nearly two and a half hours long. We […]

Tags:   · · · · · · ·

The Psychopath Objection to Divine Command Theory: Another Response to Erik Wielenberg (Part two)

September 11th, 2019 Comments Off on The Psychopath Objection to Divine Command Theory: Another Response to Erik Wielenberg (Part two)

In my last post, I expounded the Psychopath objection to divine command meta-ethics (DCM) that has recently been defended by Erik Wielenberg. To recap. Wielenberg suggests that my response to his earlier “reasonable unbeliever’s objection” relies on the following principle: R) God commands person S to do act A only if S is capable of […]

Tags:   · · · ·